AGENDA
DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
Thursday, December 16, 2010 AT 7:00 PM
NORTH BERKELEY SENIOR CENTER
1901 HEARST AVENUE, Workshop B
Berkeley, CA 94704
Wheelchair Accessible

PUBLIC INFORMATION
The packet for this (and future) Design Review Committee meeting is available for review at the Berkeley Library
main branch at 2090 Kittredge Street, or online on the Design Review Committee page under Boards and
Commissions.

clip_image001.jpgThis meeting is being held in a wheelchair accessible location. To request a disability-related accommodation(s)
to participate in the meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, please contact the Disability Services specialist at
981-6342 (V) or 981-6345 (TDD) at least three business days before the meeting date.  Please refrain from wearing
scented products to this meeting.

For Communications information and Legal Notice Concerning Your Legal Rights, please refer to the last
page of this Agenda.

Meetings must adjourn by midnight, when room reservations expire. Please exit promptly.

AGENDA
I.         ROLL CALL
           Jim Goring, Chair (Appointed by Zoning Adjustments Board)
           Charles McCulloch, Vice-Chair (Appointed by Zoning Adjustments Board)
           Robert Allen (Zoning Adjustments Board)
           David Blake (Civic Arts Commission)
           Carrie Olson (Landmarks Preservation Commission)
           George Williams (Zoning Adjustments Board)
           Adam Woltag (Appointed by Zoning Adjustments Board)

II. PUBLIC COMMENTS AND COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS

The applicant and or their designee will have 5 to 10 minutes to make a presentation of their project to the
Committee. The public is also invited to make a public comment if they wish. To do so, you should fill out a speaker
card before the meeting starts and give it to the Secretary of the Committee. Please be advised that the Committee
may limit the number of speakers and the length of time allowed to each speaker (3 minutes is the usual amount of
time allowed). The public is also encouraged to submit their comments and or testimony in writing at which time it
will become a part of the public record. CONTACT: Secretary of the Committee, Anne Burns, (510) 981-7410,
2120 Milvia Street.

III. RE-ARRANGEMENT OF AGENDA ORDER
Due to the large volume of projects, and the limited amount of time available to hear each project, the Design Review
Committee has the right to re-arrange the order of the agenda in order to accommodate the projects that will not
require a lot of time.

The next Design Review Committee meeting will be held on Thursday, January 20, 2011.
 

IV. PROJECTS
1. 3240 SACRAMENTO STREET [between Alcatraz and Harmon] (DR#09-30000078):  Final Design
Review Modification
of the redevelopment of an existing multifamily residential building by demolishing the
existing building to build a new one. Modifications are proposed to colors and materials palette only. 

2. 2300 BANCROFT WAY [between Ellsworth and Rose] (DR#10-30000022): Continued Preliminary Design
Review
of the construction of a new five-story, 161 bed student-oriented group living (dorm) project with a footprint
of 23,443 sq. ft. on a property owned by St. Mark’s Episcopal Church. The proposal includes the demolition of an
existing parking structure, community facility, and classroom building.

3. 917 CAMELIA STREET [between Seventh and Eighth] (DR#09-30000038): Continued Preliminary Design
Review
of a 4,328.5 sq. ft. mixed use complex that consists of the renovation and expansion of an existing dwelling,
raised and extended to the rear of the property to accommodate two additional Arts & Crafts Studio/ Live-Work
units.

V. ADVISORY ITEMS
1. DOWNTOWN STREETS & OPEN SPACE IMPROVEMENT PLAN (SOSIP):
The SOSIP Subcommittee has
made its final recommendation for policies and design concepts for Downtown streets & open space improvements.
The Committee may comment on these recommendations, especially policy-level clarifications and differences.
These comments will be forwarded to Council with the draft Plan.

VI. COMMUNICATIONS

                  2011 Design Review Committee Meeting Dates

VII. DISCUSSION ITEMS

                  Recent buildings in Berkeley – best practices.
                      Final color selection process after Final Design Review

VIII. BUSINESS MATTERS

                  Approval of Previous Meeting Minutes
                       A. Minutes from 10/21/2010 DRC Meeting
                            Recommendation: Approve Minutes

IX. ADJOURN (by 11:15 pm)
 
COMMUNICATIONS

Communications to Berkeley boards, commissions or committees are public record and will become part of the
City’s electronic records, which are accessible through the City’s website.  Please note: e-mail addresses,
names, addresses, and other contact information are not required, but if included in any communication
to a City board, commission or committee, will become part of the public record.
If you do not want your
e-mail address or any other contact information to be made public, you may deliver communications via U.S. Postal
Service or in person to the secretary of the relevant board, commission or committee.  If you do not want your contact
information included in the public record, please do not include that information in your communication. Please
contact the secretary to the relevant board, commission or committee for further information.

LEGAL NOTICE CONCERNING YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS

If you object to a decision by the Design Review Committee, the following requirements and restrictions apply:

1. If you challenge the decision of the City in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Design Review Committee at, or prior to, the public hearing.
2. You must appeal to the Zoning Adjustments Board within fourteen (14) days of the date of the action of the Design
Review Committee. 
3. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6(b), no lawsuit challenging a City Council decision, as defined
by Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6(e), regarding a use permit, variance or other permit may be filed more
than ninety (90) days after the date the decision becomes final, as defined in Code of Civil Procedure Section
1094.6(b).  Any lawsuit not filed within that ninety (90) day period will be barred.
4. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009(c)(1), no lawsuit challenging a City Council decision, as defined by
Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6(e), regarding a use permit, variance or other permit may be filed more than
ninety (90) days after the date the decision becomes final, as defined in Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6(b). 
Any lawsuit not filed within that ninety (90) day period will be barred.
5. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), notice is hereby given to the applicant that the 90-day protest
period for any fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions included in any permit approval begins upon final
action by the City, and that any challenge must be filed within this 90-day period.
6. If you believe that this decision or any condition attached to it denies you any reasonable economic use of the
subject property, was not sufficiently related to a legitimate public purpose, was not sufficiently proportional to any
impact of the project, or for any other reason constitutes a “taking” of property for public use without just
compensation under the California or United States Constitutions, the following requirements apply:
A. That this belief is a basis of your appeal.
B. Why you believe that the decision or condition constitutes a "taking" of property as set forth above.
C. All evidence and argument in support of your belief that the decision or condition constitutes a “taking” as set
forth above.
If you do not do so, you will waive any legal right to claim that your property has been taken, both before the City
Council and in court.