|
|
|
Auditor Home
Accomplishments for Fiscal Year 2006 and 2007 Key Objectives for Fiscal Year 2008 & 2009 Significant Changes from Prior Year's Budget |
School
Districts, Auditors, and Accountability (Appeared
in Berkeley Voice,Daily Planet, and Oakland Tribune, 9/20/01) By Ann-Marie Hogan, City Auditor, City
of Berkeley Berkeley’s school district is
threatened with “negative certification” because of budget
inaccuracies; Emeryville School Board directors are recalled, after
reports of deficit spending and inappropriate expenditures by the
Superintendent; Peralta District students start school without textbooks.
Students, parents, teachers and taxpayers can’t help wondering
“why can’t they get it right?” As the daughter of a California
elementary school teacher, I’ve watched the damage that’s been done to
our state’s educational system by inadequate funding, the increasing
challenges of educating
today’s students, and state and federal “unfunded mandates.”
As a City department director and elected official, I’ve learned
that accomplishing the most basic tasks of administration in a public
sector environment requires a struggle with forces, systems, and policies
that appear mysterious if not downright irrational from a business
perspective. As a member of the National Association of Local Government
Auditors, I’ll state the obvious, from the auditors’ perspective:
local school systems need an independent performance audit function. Most cities of Berkeley’s size and
larger, and many school districts, include a performance audit function,
according to Mark Funkhouser, City Auditor for Kansas City, in “The
Spread of Performance Auditing in American Cities”. This
internal performance audit function is in addition to undergoing an annual
financial audit from an outside contractor/accounting firm. The annual
financial audits take a broad look at whether the numbers in the financial
statements are accurate. Performance
auditing, in contrast, speaks to classic problems in public
administration: efficiency, effectiveness, and equity in the delivery and
administration of programs and services. An independent performance audit
provides an objective and systematic examination of evidence in order to
prepare an independent assessment of management’s performance. By audit
standards (set by the U.S. Comptroller General), the agency’s auditor
must be independent of the administration, reporting to the legislative
body (City Council or School Board) or directly to the public (elected).
This ensures that honest and forthright reports are provided to the
public, and to those with the authority to implement the changes. How can an independent performance
audit function improve a school district’s efficiency and
accountability? By
identifying problems and making recommendations resulting in improvement
in service delivery, cost savings, and improved accountability. BUSD:
A performance auditor could review budget estimates, follow up
reports on systems weaknesses identified in the annual financial audit,
evaluate the computer systems, and examine
recruiting and retention of qualified staff. (See Departmental
Budget Monitoring report on the City Auditor’s website) Emeryville: Not only budget deficits
but reports of inappropriate expenditures were discovered too late.
An annual financial audit can’t be expected to uncover details
about expenses, and is typically completed substantially after the end of
the fiscal year. An independent internal reviewer was clearly needed to
surface the problems without censorship before it was too late to take
action. Peralta: Delays in obtaining textbooks
and supplies are a chronic problem in schools.
Independent performance audits of purchasing practices are the best
solutions. A competent and independent audit
function in every school district won’t solve all the school
district’s problems. But,
without an objective and careful ongoing evaluation of an organization’s
internal controls and operational effectiveness, school boards will not
have the information they need to make the difficult decisions needed for
real improvement. The key to a successful audit program
is the willingness and capacity of responsible officials to support
ongoing independent evaluation, and to take action to make agreed-upon
changes. Auditors, elected
officials, and operating management can work together to address problems
before they become crises in our school districts, just as they do in
cities and other districts. Questions?
Comments? Ideas for
the Audit Plan? Please e-mail
the City Auditor at ahogan@ci.berkeley.ca.us,
mail to 2180 Milvia Street, 3rd floor, 94704. Audit reports are available on line at ci.Berkeley.ca.us/Auditor.
|
||
|
City of Berkeley Home / Departments / Auditor Home
|